Christina Crawford Message Board
Jason posts on 3/16/2009 12:57:35 AM
Joan Crawford should have never had the priviledge to adopt children. She only did it to furthur her dwindling career!
PAM posts on 3/13/2009 11:29:14 PM
I never met Cathy or Cindy. Cindy is dead now as is Chris, whom I only met once many years ago. Maybe Crawford mellowed as she got older. That's what the general thought is. There was always much debate over when Crawford was born..But she really was born in March of 1904, which made her 43 by the time she got those girls. OK, as for people from the past, aside from celebrities that I know who saw the abuse first hand... June Allyson, for example There is Nikki Baily who was the physical ed teacher at Chadwick, and took Christina under her wing. They are still very close today.
I, myself have read vile letters in Crawford's handwriting to Christina, about stupid, petty things...such as Thank you notes, and Christmas card lists.
There are always going to be fans who will never believe that their favorite celebrities are capable of anything but perfect, upstanding behavior. I know that first hand, from my own adopted mom, and it is useless to try to get them to see otherwise. But like it or not...Joan Crawford was a bad parent to Christina.
ross posts on 3/13/2009 10:51:38 PM
Pam is there anyone who could verifi
Christina's story? Such as classmates
at both Chadwick and Flintridge Boarding schools.
Pam,you knew Chistina, help me understand why Cindy and Cathy both denied any abuse,and why where they
treated better then Chistina and Chistaphor.
I under Chistina is tired of defending herself,and don't get me wrong I think Christina was abused,but
your the person that can help me understand why the twins denied the abuse.
Amy posts on 3/13/2009 10:19:27 PM
You know, I'm beginning to think people are right: Maybe I really do need a life. Before I go skipping off toward the sunset to look beyond this message board for that life, I'd will say good-bye to Jason, Michael, Ross, Linda, and Marcia et al., for their time. I'd most especially like to thank Rachel for her time. You, dear Rachel, I should thank. I don't think I ever would have 'seen the light' if it weren't for your constant put-downs and personal remarks about Christina Crawford because she truly or falsely exposed her mother as an abuser. (Sorry, doll, but I still think that you were the Pam-poser) I should thank you, but I won't because I don't think you would accept it as a sincere thanks. I'll just tell you to have a nice life. 'Bye!
Anonymous posts on 3/11/2009 12:45:08 AM
You need to go back to your hole, hermitt!
Michael posts on 3/10/2009 9:08:31 PM
For anonymous, It's a shame that you don't have the courage to leave your name. Are you afraid? Maybe it's you that needs to get a life.
Many of the people in this forum have been badly abused by a parent. That's not something that is so easily overcome.
Anonymous posts on 3/5/2009 11:51:08 PM
I agree. You guys make petty little comments and bicker back and forth with no purpose at all. Get a life!
ross posts on 3/5/2009 6:20:14 PM
How do you know Christina didn;t get
abused,Where you there?
It seems like theirs a bunch of imature
people on this web site!!!!You guys need to grow up and get a life!!!
Jason posts on 3/5/2009 12:18:51 PM
Christina deserved every penny
Julie posts on 3/5/2009 9:04:17 AM
So your saying that if someone got abused when they were young, that after thier parent is gone they should tell everyone just to make money. Destroy thier parent and make money off thier name. Why? They owe it to them. No. Thats greedy and selfish.
Click Here for Messages:
1 - 10
11 - 20
21 - 30
31 - 40
41 - 50
51 - 60
61 - 70
71 - 80
81 - 90
91 - 100
101 - 110
111 - 120
121 - 130
131 - 140
141 - 150
151 - 160
161 - 170
171 - 180
181 - 190
191 - 200
Note: the views expressed here are only those of the posters.